The Inclusive God

For some, Christianity needs to be sharply distinguished from ‘natural’ human insights and from alternative religious views. The uniqueness of God’s revelation, culminating in the highly specific incarnation of God in one human individual, has to be preserved at all costs. Otherwise, it is argued, Christianity becomes subservient to the shifting, self-interested and corrupt flux of human cultures. In Christ alone there is salvation.

This position – Christianity verses all other beliefs – is tempting. It heightens the emotional drama of conversion, and helps to give a strong grounding to individual and community identity. The problem is that this comes at a price: the price of denying or restricting God’s presence in creation. It becomes easy to forget that God’s first and highest gift – of existence itself – is a universal one. There is no warrant for claiming that this gift is entirely destroyed or withdrawn. What theologians sometimes call ‘general’ revelation is not of a wholly different and inferior kind from the ‘special’ revelation of distinctive Christian teaching.

God’s encounter with us comes in and through the history of a people, the changing community of church, the fragile matter of the sacraments, the voice of preaching which is always finding new dialects and accents. ‘Special’ revelation is rooted in the original gift of creation, and always mediated through our embodied, imperfect, contextualized modes of human communication.

Surely this is unavoidable if we claim to believe in the Word made flesh, the incarnation of God’s encounter with us in Christ? God does not suddenly set aside time, language, matter and change, in order to speak with a voice of timeless, immediate and self-evident certainty. God does not abolish the created world to to transport eternal truths directly into our souls. Christian revelation is fleshly, particular and always inviting new interpretation, new responses, new ways of proclamation. Our grasp of revelation is always limited. How else could it be if we are to preserve God’s transcendence and the dignity of God’s creation? That does not lessen its challenge, because only as incarnate truth can it touch and transform peoples lives with an otherness which is not of our making.

The Inclusive God. Reclaiming Theology for an Inclusive Church. 

Steven Shakespeare and Hugh Rayment Pickard.pg 46-47  2006 Canterbury Press.

Advertisements

2 Comments on “The Inclusive God”

  1. Frederick says:

    Meanwhile of course there are now more Christians in the world than ever before, both in total numbers and as a percentage of the human population; there are now more Christian schools and “universities” than ever before; there are more christian missionaries than ever before; and the entire world is saturated with Christian propaganda of all kinds, both paper and electronic.
    And yet the human world is becoming more and more insane every day.
    Indeed some of the leading vectors of the now universal insanity/psychosis are right wing so called conservative Christians – Edward Feser’s friends for instance.

  2. spienaar says:

    Christianity is on the up and insanity is on the up so the one is the cause of the other?

    First of all, I was under the impression Christianity was on the down in the western world.

    Second of all, aren’t you confusing correlation with causation in that idea? That’s a logical fallacy.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s